truth that angers
In a normal (pre911) world you all would never be as easily fooled as you seem to be today. This is an amazing news story which begs the question...."what the f**k?". I admit I never took as close of a look at the image since I've had to quickly go over the past few days worth of news in less than an hour. And it proves that even a rational truistic realist such as myself can miss things the media passes as truth. (Shedding the natural instinct to trust those who are in control of information is time consuming and difficult as in demands rational thought for an extended period of time, something which is difficult for anyone to do).
This article can of course, go in all different directions. Is this proof of deception on the part of the Planners and the authorities we are supposed to trust in and believe in? Is this evidence of how technology can fool even the most guided of souls? Is this evidence of talented anti-war citizens with an agenda contrary to the Planners'? The spin on this will be a dizzying experiene I'm sure.
Check out the railing. And his head. F-A-K-E.


Comments
on Jul 25, 2005
I think you've cracked it.

Tony Blair (in coalition with Bush) have framed these poor innocent young men and planted those bombs to fool the gullible public into going along with the myth that there are murderous Muslims out there.

Except, what the fuck would they gain from that and where the fuck are these men now if they didn't blow themselves up?
on Jul 25, 2005
RH, I'm surprised you haven't blamed Bush for the bombings in London to distract the attention Rove is getting.
on Jul 25, 2005
With quality of image like that the only thing I can be for sure of is nothing. Those guys could have been wearing red. If this were a sharp image you might have a leg to stand on but you couldn't make out that guys face even if you blew it up. The resolution is just not there. Sorry RH ... Try again.
on Jul 25, 2005
If he were truely edited into the frame, then he would have been either completely in front of or completely behind the bars. To insert him half way between the bars would require them to break the image apart into layers and then intentionally lay him BETWEEN the layers for the first and second bars.

In order for this to be a doctored image through superimposing the rear man onto the image, they would have had to intentionally created a bad edit, because those overlaying bars are so bad they would have to have been INTENTIONALLY left there.

I mark this one up to poor photo quality... or simply out-right stupid photo manipulators. I'd side with the former.
on Jul 25, 2005
And after posting this, you want to talk about shadow's source being mere propaganda? Look to your own first and foremost. And I hate to tell you this but....Zoom has the right of it!
on Jul 25, 2005
At least with "memogate" the people doing the technical debunking had years of industry experience with typesetting, and were able to give detailed, step-by-step descriptions of the principles involved, the history behind the technology, and the procedure they followed to reach their conclusions.

All of which is missing from the analysis of this photo.
on Jul 25, 2005
Here is RH's source for this information -
Dwayne Coots has been actively fighting the new world order for decades. His life is dedicated to using technology to free people and expose the Illuminati’s military/industrial/banking slavery conspiracy.thats the owner of the site that posted the article he refers to. Now theres a quailty source for you. Want to talk sources RH? Lets talk yours.. oh and that quote is from Dwaynes own site!!
on Jul 26, 2005
Here is RH's source for this information -


How hillarious. RH is a hypocrit once again.
on Jul 28, 2005
Hey RH, answer this one too while you at it.. OK.. Be a good sport and respond to the people who are nice enough to answer you.