So I take off for two days for a little family gathering and I come back to mayhem and chronic intellectual insanity. This is getting to be too much to handle. Unfortunately for the Planners, another (easily handled because the citizenry are so ignorant and gullible) incident took place that went under their radar. Apparently, a Cambridge dancer named Bruce Lait survived the Tube bombing and he unwittingly solved the entire incident, in spades. This is where you educated people are going to change the laws of physics and make yourselves obviously in denial.
"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.
As we all know and can usually easily understand, when a bomb explodes, the blast takes the path of least resistence. Any drone here could take a bomb, place in on the ground, and detonate it. Do it a hundred times. Unless you are using a bunker-busting bomb, you will not get a crater. That's a scientific fact. Let me make a correction. If you use the explosives the authorities are saying was used, you will not get a crater. There is no need for this trivial nonsense since it's something we would normally understand on a whim. The times they are a changin.
Once again I have to be the one to explain to people that if a bomb goes off on a floor, bits of that floor do not end up through the ceiling. The only way you get the floor into the ceiling is, obviously, by exploding something UNDER that floor. Not on, not over. Only under. This elementary fact alone should be enough to make people sadly laugh at what we are being told to believe. Goivanni Falcone's Sicilian death is a prime example of this. Placing a lot of explosives under a road leaves a massive crater. Placing less explosives under a train leaves a smaller crater. The crater-bomb fact is enough for ANY real investigator to KNOW IMMEDIATELY the explosive in question was an underground one. I know it's not easy to see rational facts when it's too horrendous to contemplate. So you can just insult me to bypass the facts, but I hope you will all skip that litany and instead consider and consider and maybe in the end even understand. It's not hard. The hard part is getting past the idea your trusted government is lying to you about serious important issues. Once you do that, the logic falls into place. A bomb on the ground leaves no crater. A bomb under the gound leaves a crater. Simple. So a dancer unwittingly explained the entire false flag operation in one simple statement. The scary thing is how the policeman was too stupid to even understand the implications of what he was seeing. The Planners will likely deal with him in some petty way. A cog taking the entire plantation apart. That's a rare slip-up on the Planners' part.
To make things easy for those who wish to debunk my comments, I will lay it out in easy order.
1. Bomb crater proves bomb was under the surface of the train, not on top of the surface.
Your comments please.