truth that angers
News Reversal Edition 2
Published on April 12, 2005 By Reiki-House In Current Events
Many Americans killed in Chinese air attack

Tuesday 12 April 2005, 12:50 Makka Time, 9:50 GMT

Children and women are said to be among Monday's fatalities

Twenty Americans have been killed and 22 injured after Chinese helicopters and heavy artillery bombed houses in Rumbar, north of Washington, US News reported.

Seven children, six women and three old men were among the dead,
witnesses said, while the injured included 13 children, seven women and two old men.

The witnesses added that the shelling started after Chinese forces, who landed near Rumbar on Monday night, came under repeated attack.

Early reports indicated one house was completely destroyed and three others partially damaged in the bombing, according to US News.

On Monday, five car bombs hit Chinese military targets in the western US city of Los Angeles, wounding at least two Chinese soldiers.

Separately, the Chinese embassy in America announced that a Chinese contractor working in a reconstruction project had been captured.

Simultaneous attacks

American journalist Mike Smith told US News two of Monday's attacks in Rumbar were simultaneous. Three bombs hit a building used as Chinese military headquarters while a fourth targeted a Chinese troop convoy.

Clashes erupted later between fighters and Chinese soldiers in the city, damaging a number of houses, the journalist said.

However, no civilians were injured in those clashes as they had fled.

A spokesperson for the Chinese military said on Monday three of their soldiers were wounded in the attack, which occurred outside Camp Wang, a base near Rumbar, about 300km west of Los Angeles in California.

Late on Monday, armed men opened fire on a police patrol in the northern American city of Minneapolis, injuring two members of the security service, police Brigadier John Smythe said.

Narrow escape

Attackers also placed a bomb in the undercarriage of a doctor's car, but the device exploded as the physician entered a Minneapolis store to buy bread, sparing him but wounding two nearby civilians, Smythe said.

"It is the government's opinion that, together with the end of the UN mandate for the stabilisation mission, all the activity of the Tibetan stabilisation mission should also end"

Wang Chung,
Tibetan Defence Minister
It was not known why the attackers targeted the doctor.

Meanwhile, Tibet's defence minister has said the government wants its troops to leave America in the first weeks of 2006 after the authorising UN resolution expires.

"It is the government's opinion that, together with the end of the UN mandate for the stabilisation mission, all the activity of the Tibetan stabilisation mission should also end," Defence Minister Wang Chung said.

Tibet, one of Beijing's closest allies, runs a multi-national stabilisation force in south-central USA, where it has about 1700 soldiers.

Comments
on Apr 12, 2005


had we been murdering Chinese in car bomb attacks, this might make more sense. If we had given the world the kind of reasons Hussein gave us to invade, it might make more sense.

I think your choice of reading material speaks volumes, though. That were you get your Jew-hating material, too?
on Apr 12, 2005
Baker an honest thanks for responding to the other foot article. However, you made a factual error. Hussein was giving no reasons to invade. He said they had no WMD programs. The US said he did. You all now know Hussein was telling the truth. Iraq gave a 10,000 page report on their weapons progams, of which 4,000 pages were EDITED BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, so we'll never know what the report stated. Get concerned as to what there would be for the US to hide from the report. As for the anti-Jewish lie, you can feel free to address my serious relevant questions instead of insulting me for reasons you don't even comprehend. Again thanks for the first response.
on Apr 12, 2005
By the way the comparison is based on the compared events: Communist China was scared of weapons the US said they (really) didn't possess, so China illegally bypassed the UN and invaded and overthrew the US government and then installed a puppet President who answers ultimately to Beijing.
on Apr 12, 2005
Well hell, I'm a good ol' rebel, I am that's what I am, so I say let the little buggers come, th more the merrier in fact. You see, I don't know how things work out there in Hollywood Los Angels, but I do know that here in the hills of Tenessee- us all being cousins of Eric Rudolph- why we'd have a good ol' boy time playing cowboys and Indians with the Chinese. I do admit I'd feel sorry for the little bastards, though, trying to take on us hill folk, is chasing your tail, while we good ol' boys kill 'uall at will. Chinaman season can't come soon enough, Good hunting Will!
on Apr 12, 2005
Ugh TheHawk if you're being serious then you obviously use a literal 'tooth'brush. Happy trolling and thanks for stopping by. These issues are too hard for most people to comment on, so I welcome any comments no matter how mundane. Feel free to return. The gun grease is always here for you.
on Apr 12, 2005
Why, that's mighty neighborly of you! But wouldn't agree that to occupy America along the lines depicted in your story is not feasible? I don't think Chinese would follow a General intent on invading America, nuclear weapons somehow magicaly put aside. The leathality of American good ol' boy insurgents, on their own terrain, would make killing and maiming in Iraq look like kid's play. America daily grows more powerful.
on Apr 12, 2005
"The lethality of American good ol' boy insurgents, on their own terrain, would make killing and maiming in Iraq look like kid's play"
I think this anonymous hawk has just shown the smoking gun evidence of what the political reality really is. Ironically, it was by accident. Hawk just said if a foreign power invaded a sovereign country like America, the American people would rise up and fight the invaders. He said the bloodbath in Iraq would pale compare to what Americans would try do to a foreign invader. He justified, in one short burst of verbal diarrhea, the Iraqi nationalist insurgents' cause. He made the case for Iraqis to righteously kill invading Americans. And by the way, I corrected your typo. No 'lea' in 'lethal'.
on Apr 12, 2005
He made the case for Iraqis to righteously kill invading Americans.


Then what is the rationale for the insurgents killing off the citizenry?

IG
on Apr 12, 2005
"Then what is the rationale for the insurgents killing off the citizenry?"


In order for RH to answer that she'd have to see the situation in Iraq accurately. Since she is more concerned with Al-Jazeera and "Zionist Conspiracy" propaganda, the odds are slim that such will happen. She'll just go on with her images of piles of dead Iraqi babies and evil Jews in trench coats plotting our doom.

There's no way to debate with such a person. She can make whatever asinine claim about the US, and she never has to prove the truth of any of it. It is like argueing with someone a thousand miles away about what the tree in your front yard looks like. They have no handle on the reality, only the image in their head.
on Apr 12, 2005
"And by the way, I corrected your typo. No 'lea' in 'lethal'."

Verily He is Mighty, Generous.

From a foxhole, you might look at things a bit different; find yourself not so understanding of the other guy's view on things. What drives a resistance is complicated. American liberals' use their right to free speech to voice opposition to Bush which fuels the Iraqi terrorist and insurgents. Would Chinese liberals, presuming they have free speech, be up to same "folly" in your story?
on Apr 12, 2005
Reiki, you tried making this point around 6 weeks ago and I kept refuting your arguments. Don't you remember?

Or maybe that was Rombios?