truth that angers
Published on July 25, 2005 By Reiki-House In Current Events
So I take off for two days for a little family gathering and I come back to mayhem and chronic intellectual insanity. This is getting to be too much to handle. Unfortunately for the Planners, another (easily handled because the citizenry are so ignorant and gullible) incident took place that went under their radar. Apparently, a Cambridge dancer named Bruce Lait survived the Tube bombing and he unwittingly solved the entire incident, in spades. This is where you educated people are going to change the laws of physics and make yourselves obviously in denial.
"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.
As we all know and can usually easily understand, when a bomb explodes, the blast takes the path of least resistence. Any drone here could take a bomb, place in on the ground, and detonate it. Do it a hundred times. Unless you are using a bunker-busting bomb, you will not get a crater. That's a scientific fact. Let me make a correction. If you use the explosives the authorities are saying was used, you will not get a crater. There is no need for this trivial nonsense since it's something we would normally understand on a whim. The times they are a changin.
Once again I have to be the one to explain to people that if a bomb goes off on a floor, bits of that floor do not end up through the ceiling. The only way you get the floor into the ceiling is, obviously, by exploding something UNDER that floor. Not on, not over. Only under. This elementary fact alone should be enough to make people sadly laugh at what we are being told to believe. Goivanni Falcone's Sicilian death is a prime example of this. Placing a lot of explosives under a road leaves a massive crater. Placing less explosives under a train leaves a smaller crater. The crater-bomb fact is enough for ANY real investigator to KNOW IMMEDIATELY the explosive in question was an underground one. I know it's not easy to see rational facts when it's too horrendous to contemplate. So you can just insult me to bypass the facts, but I hope you will all skip that litany and instead consider and consider and maybe in the end even understand. It's not hard. The hard part is getting past the idea your trusted government is lying to you about serious important issues. Once you do that, the logic falls into place. A bomb on the ground leaves no crater. A bomb under the gound leaves a crater. Simple. So a dancer unwittingly explained the entire false flag operation in one simple statement. The scary thing is how the policeman was too stupid to even understand the implications of what he was seeing. The Planners will likely deal with him in some petty way. A cog taking the entire plantation apart. That's a rare slip-up on the Planners' part.
To make things easy for those who wish to debunk my comments, I will lay it out in easy order.
1. Bomb crater proves bomb was under the surface of the train, not on top of the surface.
Your comments please.



Comments
on Jul 25, 2005
While you are probably right the explosives were placed under the floor, if that is exactly how it happened, I only have two words for you ... Shaped Charge. It is entirely possible to define the blast from the explosive.
on Jul 25, 2005
Crazy people always seem to see sane society as crazy...

The crater thing is idiotic. It is totally dependant on what was under the bomb, and above it. You don't know if there were welds there, if there were any reinforcements under it. Was the bag placed under a steel reinforced seat? If so the explosion could have easily been directed down.

You basically know what a "dancer" would know about explosives placed on that spot. Car bombs leave craters quite often. Any bomb can leave a crater depending on how the explosion is directed by what it is in and around.

You "knew" what this was before you ever heard any "proof". Therefore, an insignificant scrap of anything would have "proved" you were right, since for you it is a forgone conclusion. You've even resorted to making "Crossing Over" style predictions, pretending that anything in the future that happens "proves" you knew it was going to.

You're an idiot, and were it my site I wouldn't pay cash to give you a free venue for your stupidity. Sit in your little bunker and pretend there are "Planners" (most likely Jews in your sick little world). I have the satisfaction that you waste away in your paranoid fantasies and benefit in no way from your hateful suffering.

Eventually you'll say the wrong thing and depart for good. We're all keeping our fingers crossed.
on Jul 25, 2005
it's possible that the bomb was tossed onto the tracks underneath the train.

You're right that a damage hole where the edges of the metal are pushed upward implies a bomb under the material. Take a sheet of tin foil and hold it tight, now take a screw driver and punch from one side. There's an upwards ridge on the side you pushed to. The force pushes the surface outward.

This however does not prove your no-crater theory. A bomb can and will leave a crater (a concave depression) depending on the force of the bomb and the material it detonates over. A bomb sitting on a tile floor will blow out the tiles underneath it. A bomb of suffecient size will also crater cement or asphalt.

A hole punched through the floor of a train does not prove that the bomb was planted underground. It could have been in a bag tossed under the train. Also, it does not prove that the bomb was not in the carraige itself. Explosions can trigger secondary blasts if there's anything remotely explosive nearby. Mess with high-voltage (i.e what subways run on... that third rail is nasty) and you can see explosions as a result.

You almost had a point on physics, then you went and said stupid shit as a result. Nice try again... this one wasn't a conspiracy like you want it to be.
on Jul 25, 2005
You don't know when the phrase was uttered. The investigators could have lifted up the metal to examine the place where the bomb had detonated.

OF couse we dont actually know the police siad it at all.

IG
on Jul 25, 2005
"Shaped Charge", idiot!
on Jul 25, 2005
Oh and Rh's source for this great physics lesson?
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/ and http://www.prisonplanet.com

Now there are two very credible sources for you. One who's name has "propaganda" in it. LOL RH my friend, please do your self a favor, seek professional help.

Oh and here is a link to a photo of a car bomb that left a crater. According to your logic, this can't happen. http://www.theallineed.com/news/0411/061802.htm .

Oh and the Army Explosives Manual states:
3-2. Principles of Demolition

a. EFFECTS OF DETONATION. When a high explosive detonates, the explosive changes violently into compressed gas at extremely high pressure. The rate of change is determined among other things by the type of explosive and the density, confinement, and dimensions of the charge. Thus the detonation releases tremendous pressure in the form of a compressive shock wave which, although it exist for only a few micro-seconds at any given point, may shatter and displace objects in its path as it proceeds from its point of origin. This shock wave is transmitted directly to any substance in contact with the charge, other characteristics being equal. A high explosive charge detonated in direct contact with a solid object produces three different easily detectable destructive effects. (1) CRATERING. The surface of the object directly under the explosive charge will be cratered. On a concrete surface the high pressure of the compressive shock wave crumbles that material in the immediate vicinity of the charge, forming the crater. On a steel target an indentation or depression with an are about the size of the contact area of the charge is made in the surface of the plate. (2) SPALLING. Providing that the charge is of sufficient size, the opposite side of the object will be spalled. The strong compressive shock wave transmitted into the material expands spherically losing energy as it moves through the material. If the target has a free surface on the side opposite the charge, the compressive shock wave will be reflected as a tensile shock wave from that free surface because of the difference in density between the target and the air. Reflection of the compressive shock wave as a tensile shock wave causes spalling of the target free surface, wherein a portion of the material is literally torn from the free surface. On a concrete wall, depending upon the relative size of the charge and thickness of the wall, the crater and spalls meet and form a hole through the wall. On a steel plate, usually only one spall, approximately the shape of the explosive charge, is thrown from the plate. (3) CRACKING. If the explosive charge is of sufficient size the high pressure gases from the explosive charge will create a pressure load on the object that will crack and displace the material beyond the extent of the crater and spall. These cracks will radiate from the charge position. On concrete walls, this craking may be extensive enough to break the wall into a large number of chunks which are projected away from the charge position. On steel plates, the material may be bent away from the charge position.

OH and by the way, you need to study things like, tamping, packaging, shape and placement. Oh and the direction of initiation makes a difference also.
on Jul 26, 2005
RH debunked again. Get over your stupid conspiracy theories. Why don't you just admit what you are trying to say.